Similarly, if he must permit something in an emergency, he must clarify his reason for that particular case

Similarly, if he must permit something in an emergency, he must clarify his reason for that particular case

Just as a rabbi may not permit that which is forbidden, so must he be careful not sicuro forbid that which is permitted. Therefore, if per rabbi must forbid something merely because of verso question of law, because of per custom, or because of special circumstances, he must state his reason so as not onesto establish an erroneous precedent.

Nevertheless, it is forbidden for verso city onesto split into two congregations primarily because of verso dispute over law or practice

Per rabbi should be careful not to render an unusual or anomalous decision, unless he carefully explains the reasons for it. Therefore, any uncommon decision that depends on subtle or esoteric reasoning should not be publicized, lest it lead sicuro erroneous conclusions. It is for this reason that there are cases which are permitted only mediante the case of per scholar, and which may not be taught esatto the ignorant.

When verso rabbi renders a decision sopra per case mediante which there are niente affatto clear precedents, he must strive puro bring as many proofs as possible…

When verso rabbi renders a decision mediante per question of law, the Torah recognizes it as binding. Therefore, when verso rabbi decides on verso case and forbids something, it becomes intrinsically meetville forbidden.

Since the initial decision renders the subject of a case intrinsically forbidden, it cannot be permitted even by verso greater sage or by per majority rule.

An erroneous decision cannot render per case intrinsically forbidden. Therefore, if per second rabbi is able esatto show that the original decision is refuted by generally accepted authorities or codes, he may reverse the original decision.

Similarly, a decision that is retracted with good reason does not render a case intrinsically forbidden. Therefore, if a second rabbi is able onesto determine that common practice traditionally opposes the initial ong authorities, he may convince the first rabbi esatto retract his decision and permit the case mediante question. Individual logic and judgment, however, are not considered sufficient reason for per rabbi preciso reverse even his own decision…

Per order preciso prevent controversy, one should not present a case before per rabbi without informing him of any previous decisions associated with that particular case.

One rabbi can overturn the decision of another only if he can prove the initial decision preciso be erroneous

Although the Torah demands a un degree of uniformity con practice, it does recognize geographical differences. Therefore, different communities may follow varying opinions mediante minor questions of Torah law.

However, where there is no geographical or similar justification for varied practices, such differences are liable esatto be associated with ideological divergences and are forbidden. Within per celibe community, the Torah requires verso high degree of uniformity per religious practice. Durante in nessun caso case should it be made to appear that there is more than one Torah.

It is written, “You are children of God your Lord; you must not mutilate yourselves (lo tit-godedu)” (Deut. 14:1). Just as it is forbidden sicuro mutilate one’s body, so is it prohibited preciso mutilate the body of Judaism by dividing it into factions. To do so is sicuro disaffirm the universal fatherhood of God and the unity of His Torah.

It is therefore forbidden for members of per solo congregation puro form factions, each following per different practice or opinion. It is likewise forbidden for a celibe rabbinical court onesto issue per split decision.

However, where verso city has more than one congregation, or more than one rabbinical trapu, the following of each one is counted as a separate community, and each one may follow different practices.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Shopping Cart